So, the FIA hasn’t even rolled out the 2026 engine regs yet and according to the credible sources at AmUs they’re already talking about the next formula. If this is true, it’s a mess. Four years of one set of rules, then we rip it up again.
The new proposal for ~2030 (per AMuS):
– 2.4L naturally aspirated V8 (like 2006–2013)
– Hybrid component delivering 220–240kW (midway between current 120kW and 2026’s 350kW)
– CO₂-neutral fuel with pre-chamber ignition for efficiency
– Turbo gone (at least sound might improve) but fuel limits will still mute it
– FIA pushing for 2029 start; RB Powertrains & Cadillac on board
– Audi & Honda resisting as they want their 2026 investments to last the promised 5 years
– Ferrari open to earlier switch if FIA gives clear direction
– Cost-cutting goal: engines simpler, cheaper, leasing to customer teams for ~€10M (down from €17–20M)
– But switching to V8 means all manufacturers redesign the blocks so it's only worth it if regs are locked for ~10 years
This is frustrating is it too much to ask for a simpler formula focused on the raceabiliy ? the 2026 regs already feel like a marketing exercise
- ~50/50 power split between ICE (~500hp) and electric (~350kW) with constant tweaking per circuit to accommodate risks of sudden electric clipping
- Gimmick "axis" modes from movable aero and electric boost with conditional deployment that will give casters a headache to comment.
And now we’re talking about binning them early for another formula, which means more costs, more churn, and less stability.
If the FIA wanted to showcase sustainability, they could’ve just promoted the insane thermal efficiency of the current engines instead of forcing a 50/50 split that creates regen limits, de-rating, and aero headaches.
As a fan I want great racing, not constant technical resets to bait manufacturers ready to flee as soon as they don't have it their way.
